The NVIDIA GeForce MSI GT72 Dominator G-831 Series brings severe, next-generation graphics performance to major video gaming note pads. Reaching efficiency levels higher than last generations high-end GTX 880M, the GeForce GTX 970M provides desktop gaming efficiency in a ultra-portable design. Enable antialiasing for a smooth and sensible gaming experience. Feel the difference with NVIDIA […]
The Asus R516UX 15.6″ R516UX Note pad is a Windows 10 House system running on an Intel Core i7-6500U processor and 16GB of DDR3L RAM. This set of features lets you utilize several efficiency and home entertainment applications at the exact same time. So, if you like this Asus laptop, then you might want to […]
Startup Battlefield Africa, and all you startup folks out there in the region aren’t going to want to miss this.
TechCrunch is excited to be partnering with Facebook to bring our illustrious startup competition, the Startup Battlefield, to Nairobi, Kenya, later this year. The Battlefield will feature several prominent startups from the region, each vying to be crowned the most promising startup in sub-Saharan Africa...[more]
On one list identify the grievances, disrespects and bad breaks:
- People who don't like you.
- Deals that went wrong.
- Unfair expectations.
- Bad situations.
- Unfortunate outcomes.
It's all legitimate, it's all real. Don't hold back.
On the other list, write down the privileges, advantages and opportunities you have:
- The places where you get the benefit of the doubt.
- Your leverage and momentum.
- The things you see that others don't.
- What's working and what has worked.
- The resources you can tap.
- The things you know.
- People who trust you.
Now, take one list and put it in a drawer. Take the other list and tape it up on your bathroom mirror. Read the list in the drawer once a month or once a year, just to remind you that it's safe and sound. Read the other list every day.
The daily list will determine what you notice, how you interpret what you see and the story you tell yourself about what's happening and what will happen.
You get to pick which list goes where.
Picking your list is possibly the most important thing you'll do all day.
There’s no end to male chauvinism, apparently. The Senator Kamala Harris example, where she was interrupted during questioning of Attorney General Jeff Sessions is just a recent example. Just another Wednesday in America:
Researchers consistently find that women are interrupted more and that men dominate conversations and decision-making, in corporate offices, town meetings, school boards and the United States Senate.
Victoria L. Brescoll, associate professor of organizational behavior at the Yale School of Management, published a paper in 2012 showing that men with power talked more in the Senate, which was not the case for women. Another study, “Can an Angry Woman Get Ahead?” concluded that men who became angry were rewarded, but that angry women were seen as incompetent and unworthy of power in the workplace.
Indeed, Jason Miller, a former adviser to President Trump’s campaign and a CNN commentator, described Senator Harris as “hysterical” and shouting during her questioning of Mr. Sessions. At times, Senator Harris cut Mr. Sessions off, but she spoke in an even tone.
I can’t say I’m surprised, since the biggest of my 2017 predictions, back in January, was that Amazon would buy Slack. I bet then it would take more money, but the word is $9 billion, which would be Amazon’s largest acquisition, yet.
Message Startup Slack Said to Draw Interest From Amazon.com | Alex Sherman, Eric Newcomer, and Alex Barinka
Corporate chatroom startup Slack Technologies Inc. has received recent inquiries about a potential takeover from technology companies including Amazon.com Inc., people with knowledge of the situation said, a deal that would be the internet-commerce giant’s biggest ever.
San Francisco-based Slack could be valued at at least $9 billion in a sale, the people said. An agreement isn’t assured and discussions may not go further, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the matter is private.
Buying Slack would help Seattle-based Amazon bolster its enterprise services as it seeks to compete with rivals like Microsoft Corp. and Alphabet Inc.’s Google. The company’s cloud-hosting unit, Amazon Web Services, in February unveiled a paid-for video and audio conferencing service – Amazon Chime – that lets users chat and share content.
Representatives for Amazon.com and Slack declined to comment.
I bet it will happen, because Amazon’s capital could provide the leverage Butterfield wants to compete with Microsoft, Google, and other players. And they could build an entire suite around Slack, instead of trying to fit it in as an afterthought at Google Cloud or Office 365. And from Amazon’s viewpoint, why not build yet another billion dollar a year business?
Yes, Amazon has launched Chime – with chatrooms – but that could become more focused on realtime communications – video, etc – integrated into Slack. More interesting is the question of what other companies to buy, to attack the enterprise work technologies stack?
Akosua Afriyie-Kumi knew nothing about weaving, let alone running a business, when she stumbled across a community in northern Ghana twisting raffia into baskets to sell on the roadside.
But the 31-year-old Ghanian, who had studied fashion in London, knew she'd spotted an opportunity.
She set up AAKS, making ritzy raffia bags that combine traditional weaving techniques with modern designs. Three years on, her bags are on sale in some Urban Outfitters stores in the U.S.
It's well known that the team that wins an Olympic relay isn't the fastest at running or swimming—it's the team that handles the handoffs the best.
The same thing is true of your job. The tasks could be done by many people, but someone who is great at your job embraces the mental effort necessary to do task switching, to read between the lines, to keep many balls going at the same time. Strategy and tactics both.
Sometimes, we think that these are the things that get in the way of our work. In fact, they are the work.
Writing a sentence is easy. Deciding what to write in the next sentence is hard.
Making decisions is exhausting. It involves perception and analysis and most of all, taking responsibility. Pretending to lead and manage is a trivial task, because there's no, "what if?"
It turns out that the mental load of management is primarily around experiencing failure.
Actual failure, sure, but mostly potential failure. Imagining failure in advance. All the current things that could go wrong. And more important, the things you're not doing that will be obvious oversights later. Our brains work overtime to cycle through these, to learn to see around corners, to have the guts to delegate without doing the work ourselves (even though that creates more imagined points of failure). Scan, touch, consider, analyze, repeat.
The other thing that's a huge load: Worry. Unlike all the things I've already mentioned, worry isn't actually part of your job. Worry (expressed through non-productive pessimistic cycles over things out of your control) is antithetical to the work you've agreed to do.
Clear your cache of worry.
It'll free up your processor to focus on the useful stuff.
Portfolio managers seek investments that promise high returns and low correlations with their other positions. For the past few years, crypto currencies have demonstrated these qualities better than other major asset classes, such as US equities, US bonds, gold, US real estate, oil, and emerging market currencies.More here
So professional investors have noticed… but much skepticism remains and there’s little understanding of what, exactly, is driving this value. Some arguments justify these values by pointing to the utility that crypto currencies provide, such as enabling cross-border payments, tracking assets, or hedging inflation.
My position is that, while these arguments are true, they miss the forest for the trees. The way to understand crypto currencies is to think of them as digital monetary commodities, and these examples of utility are part of a larger story.
The larger story is the emergence of digital monetary commodities as a competition to become a better form of money.
The late Jay Levinson created the Guerrilla Marketing series. I was lucky enough to work with him early in the arc, producing four of them.
One of the core tenets of the books was that marketing was no longer merely the work of giant organizations with giant budgets. That in fact, it was possible to spread an idea with care, guts and effort, not just with money. We wanted people, particularly small businesses, to see that they could be marketers too.
Well, that's no longer a problem. In fact, it's swung so far the other way that we have a new problem.
When marketing was expensive, it was done with care. Not only by committees that worked hard to keep things consistent, but by creators who thought deeply about their long-term reputation.
Today, because noise is everywhere, we're all surrounded by a screaming horde, an open-outcry marketplace of ideas where the race to be heard appears to be the only race that matters. And so subtlety flies out the window, along with a desire to engage for the long haul. Just a troop of gorillas, all arguing over the last remaining banana.
It turns out that there's a useful response... to ignore them. To stick to the work, to the smallest possible audience, to building something worth talking about.
What actually works in a noisy environment isn't more noise—it's the challenging work of earning the benefit of people telling people.
We don't need more hustle. We need more care and generosity.
The introduction of algorithms and AI into the justice system has not been smooth, so far:
The criminal justice system is becoming automated. At every stage — from policing and investigations to bail, evidence, sentencing and parole — computer systems play a role. Artificial intelligence deploys cops on the beat. Audio sensors generate gunshot alerts. Forensic analysts use probabilistic software programs to evaluate fingerprints, faces and DNA. Risk-assessment instruments help to determine who is incarcerated and for how long.
Technological advancement is, in theory, a welcome development. But in practice, aspects of automation are making the justice system less fair for criminal defendants.
The root of the problem is that automated criminal justice technologies are largely privately owned and sold for profit. The developers tend to view their technologies as trade secrets. As a result, they often refuse to disclose details about how their tools work, even to criminal defendants and their attorneys, even under a protective order, even in the controlled context of a criminal proceeding or parole hearing.
the algorithms used to generate probabilistic matches for latent fingerprint analysis, and to search ballistic information databases for firearm and cartridge matches, are treated as trade secrets and remain inaccessible to independent auditors.
This is a new and troubling feature of the criminal justice system. Property interests do not usually shield relevant evidence from the accused. And it’s not how trade secrets law is supposed to work, either. The most common explanation for why this form of intellectual property should exist is that people will be more likely to invest in new ideas if they can stop their business competitors from free riding on the results. The law is designed to stop business competitors from stealing confidential commercial information, not to justify withholding information from the defense in criminal proceedings.
Defense advocacy is a keystone of due process, not a business competition. And defense attorneys are officers of the court, not would-be thieves. In civil cases, trade secrets are often disclosed to opposing parties subject to a protective order. The same solution should work for those defending life or liberty.
The Supreme Court is currently considering hearing a case, Wisconsin v. Loomis, that raises similar issues. If it hears the case, the court will have the opportunity to rule on whether it violates due process to sentence someone based on a risk-assessment instrument whose workings are protected as a trade secret. If the court declines the case or rules that this is constitutional, legislatures should step in and pass laws limiting trade-secret safeguards in criminal proceedings to a protective order and nothing more.
The future of the criminal justice system may depend on it.
I did an interview with a leading Turkish vlogger. He sent me his work (in Turkish) and of course, the thing I noticed was this:
76 people who saw this interview took the time to give it a thumbs down. The interviewer flew across the world and shared his work for free, but 76 people hated it enough to affirmatively vote it down.
Of course, 1% of 108,000 is about a thousand. This is less than a tenth of that.
In fact, 1% of the 10,000 people who voted it up is 100. It's even less than that.
In just about everything we do, 99% approval is astonishing.
Because online, our lizard brain goes straight to the tiny speck, the little number that's easy to magnify.
Ignore it. Shun the non-believers and ship your work.
Robert Tombs, cited by Steven Erlanger in For Britain, Political Stability Is a Quaint Relic
Setting the stage for political realignment: first, widespread uncertainty about everything.
Ikigai (生き甲斐, pronounced [ikiɡai]) is a Japanese concept that means “a reason for being.” It is similar to the French phrase Raison d'être. Everyone, according to Japanese culture, has an ikigai. Finding it requires a deep and often lengthy search of self. Such a search is important to the cultural belief that discovering one’s ikigai brings satisfaction and meaning to life. Examples include work, hobbies and raising children.
The term ikigai compounds two Japanese words: iki (wikt:生き?) meaning “life; alive” and kai (甲斐) “(an) effect; (a) result; (a) fruit; (a) worth; (a) use; (a) benefit; (no, little) avail” (sequentially voiced as gai) “a reason for living [being alive]; a meaning for [to] life; what [something that] makes life worth living; a raison d'etre”.
In the culture of Okinawa, ikigai is thought of as “a reason to get up in the morning”; that is, a reason to enjoy life. In a TED Talk, Dan Buettner suggested ikigai as one of the reasons people in the area had such long lives.
The word ikigai is usually used to indicate the source of value in one’s life or the things that make one’s life worthwhile. Secondly, the word is used to refer to mental and spiritual circumstances under which individuals feel that their lives are valuable. It’s not necessarily linked to one’s economic status or the present state of society. Even if a person feels that the present is dark, but they have a goal in mind, they may feel ikigai. Behaviours that make us feel ikigai are not actions we are forced to take—these are natural and spontaneous actions.
In the article named Ikigai — jibun no kanosei, kaikasaseru katei (“Ikigai: the process of allowing the self’s possibilities to blossom”) Kobayashi Tsukasa says that “people can feel real ikigai only when, on the basis of personal maturity, the satisfaction of various desires, love and happiness, encounters with others, and a sense of the value of life, they proceed toward self-realization.”
Four hundred years ago, almost no one on Earth had tasted coffee. It was too difficult to move things a few thousand miles.
A hundred years ago, if you wanted a cold drink in the summer or needed to ice an injured knee, you were largely out of luck. It took millions of years of cultural and technical evolution to get to the point where people had a freezer in their house.
The industrial revolution was mighty indeed. It paved the Earth, created the middle class and changed everything. And it was a powerhouse for generations, incrementally changing what hadn't been changed yet.
The TV revolution followed, introducing mass marketing as a force that could change our culture.
Then, the 60s brought the computer revolution, which involved large devices capable of sorting, calculating and processing things that were previously unsorted.
We're living right now in the connection revolution, one powered by the internet, in which people connect to people, computers connect to computers and our culture changes ever faster, daily.
The next two revolutions are right around the corner:
The biology revolution, which has had some fits and starts, will transform our bodies and our planet. Once computers are able to see, understand and modify living things, the same acceleration of the last three revolutions will kick in.
And the AI revolution, in which we engage with computers as much as with each other, is showing itself now too.
Faster, ever faster. Moore's law ratchets technology, technology changes the culture, the culture changes the economy and it continues.
Revolutions are impossible, until they're not, and then they seem totally normal.
Iced coffee, anyone?
|I’m thinking it’s a||sign|
|that the freckles in our||eyes are mirror images|
|and||when we kiss they’re||perfectly aligned|
|And I have to specu-||late|
|that god himself did||make us into corresponding|
|shapes like puzzle||pieces from the clay|
|and||true, it may seem like a||stretch|
|but it’s thoughts like this that||catch my troubled head|
|when you’re a-||way, when I am||missing you to death|
|when you are out there on the||road|
|for several weeks of||shows|
|and when you scan the radi-||o|
|I hope this||song will guide you home|
|they will see us waving from such||great heights|
|come down now,||they’ll||say-e-||yay|
|but||everything looks perfect from far||away|
|I tried my best to||leave|
|this all on your||machine|
|but the persistent beat, it|
|sounded thin||upon listening|
|and that frankly will not||fly|
|you will hear the shrillest||highs|
|and lowest lows with the win-||dows down|
|when||this is guiding you home|
|they will see us waving from such||great heights|
|come down||now, they’ll||say-e-||yay|
|but||everything looks perfect from far||away|
|they will see us waving from such||great heights|
|come||down now, they’ll||say-e-||yay|
|but||everything looks perfect from far||away|
I looked at a lot of versions of this tab, and no one else captured the ‘stay-e-yay’s in this song.
Bold.io is headed for the deadpool.
The tool was a sort-of entepriseyish tool for writing bloggish posts. Never really toed the line in comparison with Dropbox Paper, Quip (acquired by Salesforce), Notion.so. For example, they never implemented checklists, and therefore never got into the ‘work processing’ spectrum of tools.
Psychologist Johnn Kounios was prompted to write in support of the eureka moment by Mark Zuckerberg’s Harvard commencement speech where Zuck pooh-poohed the idea of the lone genius hit by a blinding insight. Zuck may not be that sort of thinker, but many are:
One day in 1843, for instance, the Irish mathematician William Rowan Hamilton was strolling along the Royal Canal in Dublin when he had a sudden insight. As he later described it, “an electric circuit seemed to close; and a spark flashed forth.” Hamilton’s epiphany concerned so-called complex numbers. His idea, which took the form of a mathematical equation, would become (and remains today) an important tool for engineers and physicists. Hamilton immediately chiseled the equation on a stone bridge spanning the canal.
As this anecdote suggests, the eureka moment is not “a dangerous lie.” On the contrary, it is a real and benevolent force of innovation and progress.
Many advancements have resulted from a single bolt of understanding. Other examples include the geneticist Barbara McClintock’s comprehension of translocation of genetic material; Paul McCartney’s hearing the melody of “Yesterday” in his head as he awoke one morning; the pharmacologist Otto Loewi’s realization about how nerve cells communicate with one another; and the Buddha’s insight into the nature of human suffering.
Laboratory research backs up the historical accounts. Experiments that the cognitive psychologist Roderick W. Smith and I conducted in the 1990s by showed that a person can solve a problem — say, an anagram — by having the solution become available to him or her suddenly and in a complete chunk: Insights do sometimes spring to mind in their final, turnkey form. More recent research has shown that these “aha” solutions tend to be more reliable than consciously, methodically worked-out answers.
Brain-imaging studies from my laboratory and the lab of my collaborator Mark Beeman show that eureka moments are associated with a distinctive burst of high-frequency activity in the brain’s right temporal lobe. This burst of activity is preceded by a brief “brain blink” during which a person is momentarily less aware of his or her environment. Neither of these neural patterns is detectable when a person solves a problem analytically.
Some people are naturally more likely to have eureka moments than other people — their brains seem to operate in a slightly different fashion — but almost everyone has these creative insights from time to time. It’s even possible to cultivate them. Studies have revealed factors that can nudge a person’s brain into a state that is amenable to eureka moments. One of the most potent, as my colleagues and I have demonstrated, is emotion: People tend to have creative insights when they are in a positive, relaxed mood. When they are anxious, their thinking narrows and becomes analytical and cautious, which can help them to critique and refine ideas.
Though eureka-style insights appear suddenly in your awareness, it’s important to stress that they don’t come into existence from nothing. They usually consist of new connections between things that you already know. Your ability to make new connections is limited — or empowered — by the amount of knowledge you have. So if your goal is to be struck by new ideas, you first have to do the relevant homework in whatever field you hope to be innovative.
It’s also worth noting that although creative insight and analytical thinking are distinct modes of thought, they complement each other. Some eureka moments present insights that are in need of more systematic elaboration before they can be implemented. It may take several insights, each followed by analytical work, to produce, refine and assemble all the ideas necessary to complete a complex project.
Likewise, you may want to start approaching a problem with analytic thinking and then, if you reach an impasse, take a break to do something less demanding. Recent research suggests that your mental work on the problem may continue unconsciously and later produce a eureka moment. Alternating between these modes of thought can be a powerful way to generate, critique and perfect your ideas, whether they pertain to an everyday problem or the next big thing.
I often use what seems like ‘procrastination’ to allow my brain to work on deep problems while I read the news, bookmark, reorganize my to-do list, correspond. I let my mind wander, and then later, I find the deep work easier when I return to it. As that ‘recent research’ mentioned above shows (by Benjamin Baird and his colleagues):
engaging in simple external tasks that allow the mind to wander may facilitate creative problem solving.
Metafluidics was built to provide a home for digital design files and all of the other information necessary to reproduce or remix a microfluidic device. Please create a profile for yourself and peruse the repository! There are devices and parts for you to make, and also a simple interface for you to add your own. We hope that this repository will inspire both veteran microfluidic experts and a whole new generation microfluidic makers and users.
Our national faith so far has been: “There’s always more.” Our true religion is a sort of autistic industrialism. People of intelligence and ability seem now to be genuinely embarrassed by any solution to any problem that does not involve high technology, a great expenditure of energy, or a big machine. Thus an X marked on a paper ballot no longer fulfills our idea of voting. One problem with this state of affairs is that the work now most needing to be done — that of neighborliness and caretaking — cannot be done by remote control with the greatest power on the largest scale. A second problem is that the economic fantasy of limitlessness in a limited world calls fearfully into question the value of our monetary wealth, which does not reliably stand for the real wealth of land, resources, and workmanship but instead wastes and depletes it.
That human limitlessness is a fantasy means, obviously, that its life expectancy is limited. There is now a growing perception, and not just among a few experts, that we are entering a time of inescapable limits. We are not likely to be granted another world to plunder in compensation for our pillage of this one. Nor are we likely to believe much longer in our ability to outsmart, by means of science and technology, our economic stupidity. The hope that we can cure the ills of industrialism by the homeopathy of more technology seems at last to be losing status. We are, in short, coming under pressure to understand ourselves as limited creatures in a limited world.
This constraint, however, is not the condemnation it may seem. On the contrary, it returns us to our real condition and to our human heritage, from which our self-definition as limitless animals has for too long cut us off. Every cultural and religious tradition that I know about, while fully acknowledging our animal nature, defines us specifically as humans — that is, as animals (if the word still applies) capable of living not only within natural limits but also within cultural limits, self-imposed. As earthly creatures, we live, because we must, within natural limits, which we may describe by such names as “earth” or “ecosystem” or “watershed” or “place.” But as humans, we may elect to respond to this necessary placement by the self-restraints implied in neighborliness, stewardship, thrift, temperance, generosity, care, kindness, friendship, loyalty, and love.
In our limitless selfishness, we have tried to define “freedom,” for example, as an escape from all restraint. But, as my friend Bert Hornback has explained in his book The Wisdom in Words, “free” is etymologically related to “friend.” These words come from the same Indo-European root, which carries the sense of “dear” or “beloved.” We set our friends free by our love for them, with the implied restraints of faithfulness or loyalty. And this suggests that our “identity” is located not in the impulse of selfhood but in deliberately maintained connections.”
- Wendell Berry, Faustian Economics
The global head of BlackRock’s infrastructure investment group, Jim Barry, announces:
Coal is dead.
Trump can do or say whatever he wants, but the economics tell a simple story:
President Donald Trump famously campaigned on restoring coal jobs, and has continued to reiterate that commitment as president, but the economic reality makes that a futile effort.
The U.S. alone has shuttered 40 gigawatts of coal plants since 2000.
“These [coal plants] will not reopen whatever anything President Trump does,” as Bloomberg New Energy Finance recently explained, “nor do we see much appetite among investors for ploughing money into U.S. coal extraction — stranded asset risk will trump rhetoric.”
The economic reality is that cheap fracked gas and plummeting prices for clean energy has squeezed both coal production and coal consumption to levels not seen for decades.
By the way, note that the point of peak coal was 2005, the threshold of the postnormal economy in so many different economic and political arenas.
Ford celebrates 12-year-old fashion designer Egypt "Ify" Ufele, a young entrepreneur who founded the Bully Chasers charity and started her own plus-size fashion line, Chubiiline, after being bullied in school. To the tune of soul singer Marva Whitney's "I Am What I Am," Ify drives all over town in a Ford Explorer choosing fabrics, sketching designs, cutting, sewing and hauling mannequins to prepare for a fashion show.
For the creator who seeks to make something new, something better, something important, everywhere you look is something unsatisfying.
The dissatisfaction is fuel. Knowing you can improve it, realizing that you can and will make things better—the side effect is that today isn't what it could be.
You can't ignore the dissatisfaction, can't pretend the situation doesn't exist, not if you want to improve things.
Living in dissatisfaction today is the price we pay for the obligation to improve things tomorrow.
The transnational capitalist class (TCC or TNC), also known as the transnational capitalist network (TCN), in neo-Gramscian and other Marxian-influenced analyses of international political economy and globalization, is the global social stratum that controls supranational instruments of the global economy such as transnational corporations and political organs such as the World Trade Organization. In other words, it is “that segment of the world bourgeoisie that represents transnational capital”. It is characteristically cosmopolitan and unconstrained by national boundaries.
In the transnational capitalist class, according to Professor Leslie Sklair, there are four fractions which are, corporate, state, technical and consumerist. The four fractions stated by Professor Leslie Sklair, bring together transnational corporations (TNC), globalizing bureaucrats, globalizing professionals, and merchants as well as the media as members of the TCC. Also according to the Sociology of the Global System, the World Economic Forum (WEF) shows the existence of the TCC as the corporate fraction and the state fraction gather in Davos, Switzerland.
The theory of the Transnational Capitalist Class has two main principles:
- The transnational capitalist class collaborate to benefit their own interests (powerful lobbyists and super PACs);
- Nation states have less control over transnational capitalist corporations aiding in globalization.
- Carroll, William K. (2010) The Making of a Transnational Capitalist Class (Zed Books, US)
- Sklair, Leslie (2001) The transnational capitalist class (Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK). ISBN 9780631224624
- Van Der Pijl, Kees (1984, 2012) The Making of an Atlantic Ruling Class (Verso, London and Brooklyn)
- Van Der Pijl, Kees (1998) Transnational Classes and International Relations (Routledge, London and New York)
- Robinson, W. I. (2003) Transnational Conflicts: Central America, Social Change and Globalization. Verso Books, p. 39.
- Robinson, William; Jerry Harris (Spring 2000). “Towards a global ruling class? Globalization and the transnational capitalist class”. Science & Society. 64: 11–54.
- Sklair, Leslie (August 1, 1995). Sociology of the Global System (2nd ed.). The Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 352. ISBN 978-0801852114.
- Sklair, Leslie (May 2002). “Democracy and the Transnational Capitalist Class.” The Annals, 581(1): 144-157, American Academy of Political and Social Science.
The Golden Passport | Duff McDonald
What makes a workplace a great place to work? Inc. magazine teamed up with Quantum Workplace, a leader in employee-feedback software, to analyze the responses of 169,000 employees from 1,600 companies to determine what makes for a good place to work and how their employers stack up. The result: Inc.’s list of “Best Workplaces 2017” and a succinct summation of insight gleaned from the exhaustive survey: “Strong company cultures breed stunning individual and team performance.”
Video will make up 82 percent of all internet traffic in 2021, according to forecasts released today by Cisco, which sells networking equipment. Video accounted for 73 percent of traffic in 2016.
Not only are people watching more online video, they’re also watching better quality video, sapping more bandwidth. And cord cutters generate twice as much internet traffic as those who still pay for regular TV, according to Cisco.
The demand is coming from all types of internet video, including on-demand content like Netflix, web cam viewing and traditional TV options available over the internet (IP VOD).
It’s fascinating the difference it makes when colour’s added to old photos. In many cases it takes away the impression that the images were captured in another time, and this Vox video (below) gives a great insight into the colourisation process.
“Photo colourisation isn’t just colouring within the lines — it requires meticulous research to make sure that every detail is historically accurate. The colour of military uniforms, signs, vehicles, and world fashion spanning decades needs to be accounted for before even opening digital software like Photoshop. That means digging through sources like diaries, Government records, old advertisements, and even consulting historical experts to get the colours right.”
Three French boys looking at a knocked-out German panther tank, Normandy, 1944.
Coloured by Marina Amaral.
Tower Bridge construction, London, 1889.
Colorised by Dynamic Chrome.
David Attenborough, c1950-51.
Coloured by Mads Madsen.
Plenty more on Reddit’s Colorized History.
One of the commentators on this Photoshop tutorial (below) talked of adding colour to a photo of his great grandfather, to give it to his grandmother. Brilliant gift idea.
Vox video (top) via Paul Wilsdon.
“Africans are selling themselves too cheaply. When we encounter foreign investors you talk of a gold mine. We think this deal is $1 million, they believe its $100 million. Do you think they are going to say ‘why not make it $50 million or even $100 million?’… They capitalize on our ignorance.”